The Main Proceedings -HCMP-1855-2022; In the matter of the Crown (Liquidator and managing Controller Appointed)
This page is a diary of significant events to keep you up-to-speed on the latest happenings with this HUGE court case bought by Andrew Morton Garrett against the Australian government, associated corporations and individuals.
..read more
 As no justice was found on Terra Australis, the past 40 years of the International Crown Attorney General’s work has now culminated into one massive case in the International High Court of Hong Kong, along with a second smaller case. These are known as ‘The Main Proceedings’, and every Aussie deserves to know about this.Â
Andrew Garrett is taking the Australian government, banks, judiciary and ALL of their associated corporations before the international court, with years upon years of undeniable, meticulously kept evidence. With this case comes international exposure and inevitable justice. The timing of this is no accident. We are seeing the fall of the old system in real time, and The Better World Future Family are super-excited to support Andrew and his amazing team through all of it.Â
The case numbers are 1855-2022 and 1179-2026. Please check back often, you don’t want to miss this!Â
14/08/2026 'Attorney General' Michelle Rowland attempts to hide crimes citing 'national security'.
In a laughable attempt to avoid accountability for herself and others in a similar case happening right now, ‘Australian Attorney General’ Michelle Rowland tabled the following letter. She states that (standing trial) ‘would be contrary to the public interest because disclosure would prejudice the security, defence or international relations of Australia.’
It will be interesting to see if the so-called ‘Australian Attorney General’ (an unlawful position) or any others in high positions within the government or associated corporations, will produce something similar to the Hong Kong courts, considering that they have previously entered a ‘noll prosequi’, which translates to ‘we will not prosecute’. This means that they could not rebut the claims against them and could not come up with any way to avoid further incriminating themselves, so they withdrew the prosecution.
We wish Rex Patrick all the best, and will be watching this case closely. Andrew is not the only person litigating these criminals at present- they’re copping it from all angles and we are here for it!
04/08/2026 The Hong Kong Proceedings
This is a summary of documents submitted to the High Court of Hong Kong Court of First Instance, along with an overview of what is happening regarding this massive case. Andrew is in the process of reactivating HCMP-1855-2022 and is required to swear an affidavit- bringing his Australian Affidavit into the Court witnessed as an exhibit under Hong Kong Law.
..read more
Please continue to share this information with all of your contacts and social channels, we need as many eyes on this case as possible. August 24, 2026 is when proceedings kick off (see post above this one for more details)
1. Recognition of Global Authority and Appointments
The core of these proceedings is Andrew Garrett’s lawful assertion and proof of various legal capacities. He identifies as the Crown Attorney General, Global Managing Trustee, and the Liquidator and Managing Controller appointed to “the Crown” and many government and corporate entities.
Through these documents, the CAG seeks to have the High Court of Hong Kong formally recognize these appointments and the judgments he has made in those capacities. His roles give him the authority to oversee and control assets and entities that are currently operating in trust for the public.
2. Miscellaneous Proceedings in Hong Kong (HCMP 1855/2022)
Identified as the “Main Proceeding,” this case was filed in the High Court of Hong Kong in November 2022. Its primary goal is to enforce foreign judgments and secure the possession and administration of property and assets that have been seized or retained under his authority.
Key facts regarding this case include:
Asset Relocation: As no justice has been found in the Australian courts over the past 40 years, the CAG is relocating and domiciling global financial operations and primary tax jurisdiction to Hong Kong.
Accountability: The filings name hundreds of people including high-ranking public officials, judges, and major corporations, accused of systemic corruption, fraud, and a collapse of the rule of law in Australia.
Procedural Status: This documentation involves interlocutory applications to restore and list this case for hearing, as well as requests for the court to coordinate its management with newer cases.
3. Judicial Review in Hong Kong (HCAL 1179/2026)
This application, filed in June 2026, seeks a judicial review of a decision made by the Hong Kong Director-General of Investment Promotion.
The Dispute: CAG’s application for a “Net Asset Assessment” under the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (New CIES) was declared invalid because it lacked certification from a Hong Kong Certified Public Accountant.
CAG‘s Position: He argues that the decision was unlawful because the department failed to consider the “exceptional circumstances” and the vast amounts of evidence and legal context he provided.
The Goal: He is asking the court to compel the department to properly review his application and to allow the relocation and deployment of his net assets in Hong Kong.
4. Allegations of Systemic Wrongdoing
Throughout the affidavits and exhibits, CAG presents a case that he is using the Hong Kong courts to hold governments and corporations accountable for systemic misconduct.
Fraud and Corruption: The documents show that previous legal orders made against CAG in Australia were the result of fraud and are therefore null and void.
Financial Crimes: The filings show proof of money laundering, terrorism financing, and proceeds-of-crime issues involving public officials and gatekeeper professions like law and accounting.
Human Rights: CAG cites international treaties, such as the UN Convention Against Corruption and various Human Rights covenants, as the legal foundation for seeking remedies for these wrongs.
5. Requests for Record Production and Preservation
A major theme in the recent filings is the request for mandatory production of records. CAG is asking the Hong Kong court to order various entities including the Reserve Bank of Australia, the Bank of England, and the United Nations to preserve and provide access to their electronic servers and internal documents. He contends that these records are essential to prove the source, ownership, and control of the assets he intends to administer in Hong Kong.
Summary of Legal Goals
In simple terms, Andrew Morton Garrett is using the legal system in Hong Kong to:
Validate his status as a high-level official (Crown Attorney General and Liquidator) with authority over specific public and corporate assets.
Challenge administrative decisions that have hindered his ability to move value and conduct business in Hong Kong.
Lawfully hold international officials accountable for financial and procedural misconduct.
Consolidate multiple legal threads into a single, coordinated case in Hong Kong to resolve long-standing disputes with the Australian government and other entities.
Index of Documents
AMG 5489 Case 122-cv-00173-DDD-STV Document 38 Response to the Australian Government Solicitor dated 18.03.22 copied to Clerk of the Court pages 1 – 20 compressed.PDF
A response filed in a United States court case where Andrew Morton Garrett explains his termination of the Australian Attorney General’s authority over specific public funds
.
AMG 5857 HCMP-1855-2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE CROWN (LIQUIDATOR, MANAGING CONTROLLER APPOINTED) ALSO SEALED BY DISTRICT COURT.pdf
The primary legal document (Originating Summons) that started the main case in Hong Kong, seeking to have the court recognize Andrew’s authority and enforce his prior legal decisions
.
AMG 5858 SERVICE OF HCT(HK)-1855-2022; IN THE MATTER OF CROWN ATTORNEY GENERAL (LIQUIDATOR; MANAGING CONTROLLER APPOINTED) ORS PART 1.pdf
Evidence and records showing that the Hong Kong legal papers were officially delivered to the various government and corporate parties involved
.
AMG 6875 Letter to Attorneys General PAGES 1-100 of 211 FAX CONFIRMATION.pdf
A confirmation record showing that a massive 211-page legal letter was successfully faxed to government legal leaders
.
AMG 6875 Letter to Attorneys General Care of the Judicial Committee of The High Court of Hong Kong 31st July 2023.pdf
A formal letter submitted to the Hong Kong court explaining that international legal officials have been notified of these proceedings
.
AMG 6879 HCMP-1855-2022; Fax No +852-2524 9725; hc_30_list_of_documents.pdf
A court-required list that indexes all the specific pieces of evidence and documents AMG is relying on for the main Hong Kong case
.
AMG 7051 Letter to Judicial Clerks of The High Court of Hong Kong 6th September 2023 fax success.pdf
Correspondence sent to court staff to check on the progress of the case and ensure filings were handled correctly
.
AMG 7066 Letter to Judicial Clerks of The High Court of Hong Kong 12th October 2023 Fax Success.pdf
Additional follow-up communication with the Hong Kong court registry regarding the status of the legal filings
.
AMG 8476; HCMP-1855-2022; APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS dated 18.12.2024. V3 PART 1 pages 1-57.pdf
Part one of a request for the judge to give specific instructions on how the case should proceed, including lists of related international legal charges
.
AMG 8476; HCMP-1855-2022; APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS dated 18.12.2024. V3 PART 2 pages 58-94.pdf
Part two of the request for instructions, detailing the rules of conduct for judges and lawyers and the laws being applied
.
AMG 8476; HCMP-1855-2022; APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS dated 18.12.2024. V3 PART 3 pages 95-153.pdf
The final part of the request for directions, which names hundreds of people and companies involved in the case
.
AMG 8879b Letter from High Court Judiciary re HCMP-1855-2022 dated 4th August 2023.pdf
An official letter sent from the Hong Kong court system back to AMG regarding his case
.
AMG 8879e Letter from Judiciary dated 9th January 2025.pdf
Another official notice from the court registry regarding the ongoing administration of the legal proceedings
.
AMG 9253 Fax Confirmation Notice to Act in person 02.07.2023.pdf
Confirmation that the CAG officially informed the court he would be acting as his own lawyer in these matters
.
AMG 9573b HCAL-1179-2026; Form 86_Order 53; Andrew Morton Garrett v DGIP stamped front page 26 June 2026.pdf
The official start of a second case in Hong Kong (a Judicial Review) challenging a decision made by the investment promotion department
.
AMG 9633a Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 1; pages 1-37.pdf
The first portion of a massive sworn statement by AMG providing evidence and history for the judicial review case
.
AMG 9633b Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 2; pages 38-44.pdf
The second part of the sworn statement, continuing the explanation of the facts and the parties involved
.
AMG 9633c Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 3; pages 45-59.pdf
The third part of the statement, which includes records of emails and instructions sent to legal offices
.
AMG 9633d Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 4; pages 60-78.pdf
The fourth part of the statement, detailing the specific legal arguments and proposed court orders
.
AMG 9633e Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 5; pages 79-127.pdf
The fifth part of the statement, identifying many Australian public officials and lawyers as “interested parties”
.
AMG 9633f Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 6; pages 128-184.pdf
The sixth part of the statement, listing more international and Australian government agencies involved
.
AMG 9633g Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 7; pages 185-227.pdf
The seventh part of the statement, detailing trusts and international agencies
.
AMG 9633h Second Affidavit of Andrew Morton Garrett dated 11th June 2026 Doc 8; pages 228-268.pdf
The final section of the long sworn statement, concluding the list of various legal offices and entities
.
AMG 9633k Interlocutory Application; Andrew Morton Garrett v DGIP 16.06.2026 Lodged 3rd July 2026.pdf
An urgent request for the court to make specific temporary orders while the judicial review case is still being decided
.
AMG 9633l HCMP-1855-2022; Interlocutory Application dated 15th June 2026 executed.pdf
An application to “restore” the main Hong Kong case so that a hearing can finally be scheduled
.
AMG 9673 APPENDIX G HONG KONG GOVERNMENT REVENUE; DUTY, PROFITS TAX AND PENALTY PAYABLE BY AUSTRALIA MODEL.pdf
A detailed financial calculation showing how much money CAG claims Australia owes to the Hong Kong government in taxes and penalties
.
AMG 9676 HCAL 1179-2026_Court note dated 13.7.2026.pdf
A formal note from the court regarding the status of the judicial review case
.
AMG 9680 HCMP-1855-2022 Notice of Intention to Proceed O3R6.pdf
An official notice stating that AMG plans to continue with the main Hong Kong case after it had been inactive for some time
.
AMG 9681 HCMP-1855-2022 Order 12 Representative Proceedings 15.07.2026.pdf
A request for the court to allow AMG to represent a larger group of people or public interests in the case
.
AMG 9684 HCMP-1855-2022; Succession of States Interlocutory Application dated 16th July 2026.pdf
An application asking the court for directions on how international treaties and the transfer of state power should be handled
.
AMG 9686 HCMP-1855-2022 NOTICE OF SUCCESSION OF STATES 18th July 2026.pdf
A formal notice declaring a legal change or “succession” in the authority governing specific states and territories
.
AMG 9691 HCMP-1855-2022; Notice of Change of Address for Service of the Applicant dated 20th July 2026.pdf
An administrative update telling the court and other parties where to send official mail for AMG
.
AMG 9692 HCMP-1855-2022 Affidavit 22.07.2026 Exhibit Book Part 1 Pages 60 -137.pdf
The first half of a new book of evidence supporting recent updates in the main case
.
AMG 9692 HCMP-1855-2022 Affidavit 22.07.2026 Exhibit Book Part 2 Pages 138-186.pdf
The second half of the evidence book, containing more supporting documents and exhibits
.
AMG 9692 HCMP-1855-2022 Affidavit 22.07.2026 executed.pdf
The signed and finalized version of the latest sworn statement for the court
.
AMG 9712a Letter from the Court 27th July 2026.pdf
A recent letter from the Hong Kong High Court regarding the next steps in the legal process
.
AMG 9712b Notice to Act Putative Respondent and Putative Interested Party dated 14th July 2026.pdf
A notice identifying the parties who are expected to respond to or have an interest in the newest court filings
.
CTUR-CKLUCW; File reference 11805;22 ASIC Refusal to accept DCB Financial Services License for Filing Team Leader Cassandra Turner 28th October 2022.pdf
A record of an Australian government agency (ASIC) refusing to accept a banking license application, which is used as evidence of government misconduct.
Links to documents:
18/07/2026
We have been given the green light to announce that The high court of Hong Kong court of first instance has listed Andrew Garrett’s case (HCAL 1179-2026) and it officially kicks off in August!! Andrew is taking on the Australian government, judiciary, police, the crown and all associated corporations, with 40 years worth of evidence of their corruption. It’s no overstatement to say that this is the biggest news in Australia’s history, so please share far and wide!! Send this page to your loved ones and associates, and help us spread the word because you definitely won’t hear about this on mainstream media! As they say, ‘The revolution won’t be televised.’
What happens now? the ‘bad guys’ have until the 24th August 2026 to submit a formal rebuttal to Andrew Garrett’s claims. If they refuse, (likely, because there is no rebuttal for their very well documented crimes), then by tacit acquiescence (admission of guilt via silence), Andrew Garrett and all Australians win the case. If [they] do offer a rebuttal then Andrew has until the 5th October 2026 to officially comment on their rebuttal. Since he has endless hard evidence of [their] crimes, they don’t have a leg to stand on.Â
What happens when Andrew wins? Change. Big change. No more dystopian criminal cartels disguised as ‘government’, ‘judiciary’ and ‘law enforcement’, no more theft of our hard earned dollar, and a return of assets and resources back to the people. This begins in Australia but will have a ripple effect throughout the entire world. This is the justice we’ve all been praying for.
